this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
761 points (96.8% liked)

Science Memes

11217 readers
2314 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
761
i <3 statistics (mander.xyz)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
 

Disclaimer: This is a joke. Ecofascism is obviously bad, kids. Don't be that guy.

https://theconversation.com/8-billion-people-why-trying-to-control-the-population-is-often-futile-and-harmful-194369

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 16 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It looks like my ass is very knowledgeable. Definitely a good source

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Do you have long horns and an average testosterone level of 2.7 ng/ml?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Bulls, implying that their ass "is a good source" for bullshit. 🤓

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Bullshit.

The investments of just 125 billionaires emit 393 million tonnes of CO2e each year – the equivalent of France – at an individual annual average that is a million times higher than someone in the bottom 90 percent of humanity.

That is to say, if you multiply the emissions of the gasoline sold by ExxonMobil by whatever percentage of ExxonMobile that's in Bill Gate's portfolio, you get an absolutely ridiculous emissions number.

But that seems to assume that if it weren't for those dastardly billionaires investing in oil companies, we'd all be living in 10-minute cities with incredible subways connected by high speed rail, powered entirely by renewables, and heated by geothermal heat pumps. And I honestly don't beleive that.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Considering that the oil companies bought up the trolley companies, and shut them down, I would argue that without those particular billionaires, we would still be building walkable cities the way we did for centuries, until they decided that cars should be essential, but a luxury at the same time.

Edit: this is specifically applicable to the US

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sure - blame Rockefeller, Henry Ford, etc. for that. Also e.g. Robert Moses, not that he was a billionaire. But they're all dead. They've been dead.

Is America's suburban sprawl the fault of Bill Gates in particular? Or Bezos, Musk, or Dell?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Do they have any investments in the oil sectors? And Musk is absolutely trying to keep cars and kill mass transit. He admitted it. Bezos definitely has invested in making our cities the unwalkable hell scape that the oil companies started.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Are you not responsible for the things you own?

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

well well well