this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
86 points (75.6% liked)

Technology

59287 readers
4401 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
86
The Google Play Store Ruling Is Bad News for Longtime Android Phone Users (gizmodo.com)
submitted 10 months ago by AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Not to editorialize, but I think this is kind of a crazy article. Sharing for the laughs and the discussuon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I don't understand this ruling. They all seem like minor things. And this has been true for years:

The ability for manufacturers to provide an alternative app store alongside the Play Store on new devices

Samsung has always had a separate app store install on their phones. And Xiaomi has one I'm pretty sure. Amazon definitely does.

How is it not a good thing for developers to be able to charge customers outside of the app store? I get that it may be better for security for Google to be taking care of it, but it seems financially better for developers not to have 30% of their income taken.

IDK, if someone can explain why this stuff is actually new or bad, I'd love to hear it.