this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
601 points (94.9% liked)
Asklemmy
43943 readers
514 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
because star trek has long been welcoming to gay and trans people for their inclusiveness and the fediverse is home to a lot of nerds and gay or trans (or both) people. ๐
Actually, I would go one further and say Star Trek is axon of almost ALL people.
I recently started watching TNG for the first time since I was a kid (mostly thanks to the rosa memes). The show is incredibly progressive, especially for a show that came out in 1990. I just watched a race last night where Riker โfell in loveโ with a member of an androgynous species that were not gendered.
The whole thing was about the individuals struggle to realize their gender identity.
It's wild to me that I have friends who say dis is too woke because it has real gay, trans, autistic, etc. characters, but they love TNG. Really? You sure forgot a lot of the episodes.
If you think about it, Discovery is probably the least progressive of the entire franchsie, but it caught the ire of conservative-minded people because it presents as normal things earlier shows would have made a point to explain.
It's the same way TOS had entire episodes dedicated to race, and yet in the 90s many people decsibed Sisko simply existing while black as "pandering to the PC crowd".
To quote captain Kirk: "Some people can be very frightened of change."
Agreed. I think the actual problem people have is that it's not just placeholder characters. They have depth and motivations and yeah, they're normal people, whether you like it or not. They're not there as token representation or to push a specific plot point. They just are. It's like star trek has moved on from showcasing how humanity could be different overall, to showcasing how things could be different for individual people if other people would just stop being dicks about every little thing. They don't have to push as hard, but there's more depth to the representation.
TNG had Data allow his child to choose their own gender.
TOS had one of the first televised interracial kisses.