Technology

59605 readers

3514 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

925

Google Promises Unlimited Cloud Storage; Then Cancels Plan; Then Tells Journalist His Life’s Work Will Be Deleted Without Enough Time To Transfer The Data (www.techdirt.com)

submitted 11 months ago by cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

163 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For your car repair example, it would kinda be like someone got that and then started going to every crash up derby they could find.

No, it's actually more like you bought the car because you know you're going to rack up a million miles every year. Out of the norm but not an asshole move.

If Google didn't want to lose here, they could have not had that feature.

200TB is a lot of data and a completely reasonable amount if you are doing a lot of filming. HD film takes up a lot of space, especially if it's raw.

This sort of usage is so predictable I can't imagine Google didn't consider it when pricing things out. Heck, they advertised the unlimited storage space being useful FOR preserving photos and video.

Why give a company that spent 26 billion dollars making their search engine the default everywhere because they don't want to spend the 1 million dollars it'd require to continue supporting a product they advertised. They could have ended new sign ups and just supported existing customers.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago

I don't think someone should have to maintain an offer in perpetuity because they offered it once (though this differs from "lifetime" offers).

Google should be fucked directly for their anticompetitiveness. Unlimited offers should probably be regulated and forced to specify some limit, since nothing is truly unlimited (eg an unlimited internet connection is actually limited to max bandwidth * time in period). Or maybe they should drop the "unlimited" bit in general.