Technology

59605 readers

3415 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

925

Google Promises Unlimited Cloud Storage; Then Cancels Plan; Then Tells Journalist His Life’s Work Will Be Deleted Without Enough Time To Transfer The Data (www.techdirt.com)

submitted 11 months ago by cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

163 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Don''t even need an ec2 instance if all you do is moving the data to Amazon s3. rclone can do direct cloud-to-cloud transfer, the data won't hit the computer where the rclone running, so it should be very fast. You're going to have an eye watering s3 bill though. Once the data in an s3 bucket, you can copy them to glacier later.

[–] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Server side copies will only be attempted if the remote names are the same It sounds like that's only for storage systems that support move/rename operations within themselves, and isn't able to transfer between different storage providers.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 1 points 11 months ago

You're right. Server side copy is only done when syncing between google drive.