this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
483 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59207 readers
3102 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 20 points 11 months ago (3 children)

musk is one of the richest man alive, why does he need subsidies to do his job??

[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)

clearly you’re not rich. the rich stay rich by spendng other people’s money.

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

this guy knows material dialectics

[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This isn't really a great argument. Subsidies are there to promote the things we want to come to fruition. Want your people to have solar? Subsidies for putting one on your roof. You want more electric cars on the road even though more expensive? Subsidies.

You want a billionaire to help a new technology reach people he wouldn't bother with? Subsidies.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

So we do that by giving them even more fucking money, instead of taking it away when they do a shitty thing, like ruin our atmosphere with fossil fuels.

[–] firefly@neon.nightbulb.net 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

musk is one of the richest man alive, why does he need subsidies to do his job??

Socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor. Next question ...