this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
488 points (95.5% liked)

Games

32480 readers
923 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
488
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by avater@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] cttttt@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I'm kinda scared that the trailer was knee deep in "from the ____ who did _____ ."

Granted, it's a teaser trailer, but it would have been cool to see a little more of what this show has to offer. e.g. The Boyz is great, because the story adapted from it's source material was already interesting. I'd love to learn more about the story of this adaptation, esp since there's a lot they'd have to do to turn the non linear, choose your own adventure source material into a non-interactive story.

Feels like the showrunners and story writers would have the opposite challenge of, say, The Last of Us. There, it was all about retelling an existing story and resisting the urge to reinvent too much.

Here they'd need to pick one of many stories and fill in a bunch of gaps.

Hope it works out ๐Ÿคž๐Ÿ™

[โ€“] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Even though each game is a player driven RPG, there's a canon "through line" of major events from 1 to 2 to New Vegas. 3 and 4 are set far enough away or in a different enough period of time that the plot impact is more minor.

Personally though, I hope this is less of an adaptation and more of a "side stories in the setting".

[โ€“] sheogorath@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

From what I've read about the series it's actually set 4 years after Fallout 4 events. So it's more "side stories in the setting" rather than straight up adaptation.

[โ€“] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

If it's an anthology series following different people in different parts of the world dealing with different scenarios then I'm waaay more on board from that than what they showed us in the trailer.

[โ€“] AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you're a fallout fan, you're already on board. Our viewership is a given, and is theirs to lose. But for people who aren't big fans, having big names attached shows it's serious business. It's meant to convince people on the fence that it's worth an initial watch since there's money and names behind it so maybe it's not just "some dumb low budget video game shit."

[โ€“] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't know. I've played every Fallout game (except tactics and that weird PS2/Xbox game) and it won't even be on my radar until word of mouth confirms it's good. The moment I saw Todd Howards name my interest plummeted. I'm happy that Bethesda has kept the franchise alive but Fallout 3 and 4 are a whole step below what Black isle/Obsidian created. If the show is going to be based on the Bethesda vision of Fallout then it's instantly going to be at odds with the fanbase.

[โ€“] AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Maybe it'll be good, maybe it won't. But after the 400+ hours I spent in fo4, I'm willing to commit to another hour to see if the first episode is any good. I've spent longer than that hunting for literal trash in-game. :)