this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
390 points (97.6% liked)

World News

39000 readers
2357 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

BRUSSELS — As the investigation into damage to Baltic Sea critical infrastructure continues, Finland's Minister of European Affairs Anders Adlercreutz said it’s hard to believe sabotage to the undersea gas pipeline was accidental — or that it happened without Beijing’s knowledge.

“I'm not the sea captain. But I would think that you would notice that you're dragging an anchor behind you for hundreds of kilometers,” Adlercreutz said in an interview Thursday in Brussels. “I think everything indicates that it was intentional. But of course, so far, nobody has admitted to it.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

So… despite all the seriousness, I have to ask. The name of the ship is NewNew Polar Bear?

What happened to the New Polar Bear? And the Polar Bear?

[–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So, I can't easily find the name of the ship in Chinese, but it could possibly be a translation error during naming? New New is xīng xīng in pingying (romanized phonetic Chinese), which is also the same spelling as star... If whoever did the translation was bad at it and did it solely off of the phonetics or romanized spelling.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

so... it's Star Polar Bear? Huh. There goes a good joke. thanks for the information.

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

No, it's Newnew.

Or... well, on the ship itself it's spelled New New, which is a lot saner and funnier than Newnew.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

So I guess we know who used Google translate?

[–] TheOgreChef@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

If they also had a penchant for dragging anchors for hundreds of kilometers, I think we can make a few educated guesses as to their fate.