this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
1033 points (98.9% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2752 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukraine’s security service blew up a railway connection linking Russia to China, in a clandestine strike carried out deep into enemy territory, with pro-Kremlin media reporting that investigators have opened a criminal case into a “terrorist attack.”

The SBU set off several explosions inside the Severomuysky tunnel of the Baikal-Amur highway in Buryatia, located some 6,000 kilometers east of Ukraine, a senior Ukrainian official with direct knowledge of the operation told POLITICO.

“This is the only serious railway connection between the Russian Federation and China. And currently, this route, which Russia uses, including for military supplies, is paralyzed,” the official said.

Four explosive devices went off while a cargo train was moving inside the tunnel. “Now the (Russian) Federal Security Service is working on the spot, the railway workers are unsuccessfully trying to minimize the consequences of the SBU special operation,” the Ukrainian official added.

Ukraine’s security service has not publicly confirmed the attack. Russia has also so far not confirmed the sabotage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] totallynotaspy@kbin.social 360 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

OP missed the fun bit after the tunnel bombing:

The first cargo train exploded directly in the Severomuysky tunnel.

To continue transportation, the Russians began to use the detour route through the so-called Devil’s Bridge — a 35-meter high viaduct structure, which is part of the Trans-Siberian Railway. At that point, SBU saboteurs struck again.

“When the train was passing over this 35-meter high bridge, the explosive devices embedded in it went off,” the same official added.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 159 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Damn impressive.

Sounds straight out of a WWII action/spy/war movie.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure plenty of similar things happened in every war ever.

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What, even the ones predating locomotives?

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Ha sorry, I didn't mean to imply scenarios involving locomotives. I referred more to the ingenuity of warriors to carry through clever attacks.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 125 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for the details

Just to add, according to Denys Davidov's report on ukraine, the first train was carrying jet fuel, which added to the whole explosion.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 100 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Jet fuel can't blow up steel beams! Wake up sheeple!

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Jet fuel can’t blow up steel beams! Wake up sheeple!

Wasn't that the reason though that the Twin Towers in NY fell, because the jet fuel melted the steel beams infrastructure?

I had read/seen that the buildings were actually designed to handle a plane crashing into them, but the architects didn't expect the metal beams to melt from the high-temperature burning jet fuel.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago (2 children)

My understanding is that the beams were sprayed with a fire retardant foam that is designed to protect it in the event of a typical building fire. But the violent impact of the jets would have stripped most of it off, and the jet fuel did indeed weaken the beams. They wouldn’t have melted outright, but softening them after already being damaged by the impact was more than it could handle.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

That's my understanding as well.

And that the fire retardant foam was designed to be hit by an airplane and stay on, but it was just designed in those days for a smaller 737 impact, and not for a heavybody plane, so it got knocked off, exposing the beams.

Edit: Lol, ok, meant beams, not beans.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

exposing the beans.

Lemmy moment.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

This lemming eatin beans!

[–] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Dammit put a NSFW warning on that post!!!!

There could be children in here!!!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You guys are all government sheeple! Everyone knows the Twin Towers never existed and 9/11 was a hologram!

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I stil remember going to a wedding reception on the top floor - it all seemed so real

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shottymcb@lemm.ee 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It didn't need to melt, raising the temperature of steel decreases it's strength.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

it’s strength

It is, is it?

[–] Auduras@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It is strength that decreased

[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

it's its strenth that decreased

[–] StorminNorman@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (11 children)

It's a conspiracy theory, and not a particularly intelligent one. Us normies like to make jokes like this mocking people who believe it, but they do actually believe it and will come up with some batshit insane logic to support their theories.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it's a really dumb meme because obviously it can. The ancient Romans worked steel, so obviously it doesn't have a particularly high melting temperature.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Jet fuel can't melt steel beams. It doesn't burn nearly hot enough.

However, for a structure to fail you don't need to melt the beams, and getting them hot enough will also damage their structural integrity; they'll fail long before they reach the melting point.

And this is what happened on 9/11.

[–] mxcory@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 11 months ago

Even wood alone is capable of getting steel red hot under the right condition. Given my experience was with metal floor grating in a burn barrel. The steel became easily malleable with just a metal rod.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

At the temperature Jet Fuel burns at, Steel becomes as flexible as cooked noodles, but technically they have not "melted."

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Also: worked metal heats up. So an entire building collapsing on hot beams can get them even hotter.

https://youtu.be/tXF60MOWUeY?si=V-j7IlmmMB3LOK9l

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cinner@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

https://youtu.be/FzF1KySHmUA

The conspiracy goes SO much deeper..... it's rumored that even physics is involved.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/FzF1KySHmUA

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Melted beams or not, the WTCs design is what made it collapse like a peeling banana. The floors were essentially cantilevered out and held in place with a load bearing facade (for an open floor concept) There wasn't much holding the floors onto the facade, once the weight of the floors began to sag down it essentially started to lever and pull the beams of the central core apart from all sides like a banana peel.

I don't think those buildings were built to withstand an airplane, at least not the one they were hit by. In hindsight that open floor concept may actually have been a stupid idea, at least the way it was executed.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I don’t think those buildings were built to withstand an airplane, at least not the one they were hit by.

From what I saw on a show that covered that a long time ago, they were, but not for the larger planes that we have today, but the ones that flew back in the 70's.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

I love how they drew the Sheeple in a completely different artstyle for emphasis.

[–] juliorapido@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 months ago

COLD FIRE! I’M FREEZING!!! ( said the steel beams)

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Russia is shooting its own foot since the start of the war... an inside job sounds plausible at this point (kidding)

[–] Restaldt@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago

Of course Russia is shooting itsself. I bet if it could throw itsself out a window it would.

How dare Russia make Russia look so weak

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 11 months ago

If it had been an inside job the explosives wouldn't have gone off.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

So they got two of three and not one of three? How is every article writer flubbing the headlines?!

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 15 points 11 months ago

The magic of AI and staff cuts.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 3 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I'm also uncomfortable with giving the SBU credit for an event that negatively impacts not only Russia but also China, which is not currently at war with Ukraine. SBU haven't taken credit for this, a Ukrainian Official is making those claims.

load more comments (5 replies)