this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
62 points (81.0% liked)

Games

16719 readers
467 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
62
Gaza conflict embroils Game Awards (www.axios.com)
submitted 11 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/games@sh.itjust.works
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

More than 70 recipients of The Game Awards' Future Class are calling for a statement to be read at next week's The Game Awards, on their behalf, in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza, amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas war.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] workerONE@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Did they? They voted on a resolution that affirms Israel's right to exist. Can you show the part of the resolution that conflates anti-zionism with antisemitism?

I'm not arguing for the resolution or anything, I just don't see what you see.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Reaffirming Israel's right to exist is the literal Zionism.

This resolution puts the House of Representatives on record as affirming the State of Israel’s right to exist. It recognizes that denying Israel’s right to exist is a form of anti-Semitism. It rejects calls for Israel’s destruction and the elimination of the only Jewish state and condemns the October 7 Hamas-led terrorist attack on the State of Israel and its people. >

https://www.congress.gov/118/crec/2023/11/28/169/195/CREC-2023-11-28-pt1-PgH5923.pdf

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

denying Israel’s right to exist is a form of anti-Semitism

Wait, so then I say I'm in favor of a secular, dual-ethnic combined state where Israelis and Palestinians live together in peace under a common democratic government, I'm an anti-Smite?

[–] Dinsmore@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Correct. Anything other than full-throated support of the current Israeli government is anti-semitic now.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nope! The state of Israel exists in opposition to that notion. A combined state will likely never happen if it is a continuance of the current state. As what you proposed existed before Britain's control of Palestine and before the forced creation of the state of Israel in 1948, broadly put. Jews, Muslims, and Christians of all shades lived there simultaneously without conflict. Then US and European powers decided to meddle and create the ethnostate. Hard to walk back from being an ethnostate.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A combined state will likely never happen

But my question wasn't about likelihood. I can still favor an outcome that's unlikely.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I would too, but I'd rather focus on outcomes that have a chance to exist. Cheers.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’d rather focus on outcomes that have a chance to exist.

And as I said: I didn't ask which outcome is the most likely, I asked whether I'd be an anti-Semite based on that definition. I don't think I am but that definition makes me sound like I was one.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

As I said, I do not believe you to be antisemitic based on that information. That would be absurd.