this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
46 points (97.9% liked)

Selfhosted

40132 readers
736 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am building a NAS in RAID 1 (Mirror) mode. Should I buy 2 of the same drive from the same manufacturer? or does it not matter so much?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If I had a dollar for every time rebuilding a RAID array after one failed drive caused a second drive failure in the array in less than 24 hours.... I'd probably buy groceries for a week.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

When using drives from the same model and batch?

[–] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 3 points 11 months ago

Yup. Same age, same design, same failures... and array rebuilds are super intense workloads that often force a lot of random reads and run the drive at 100% load for many hours.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've heard just in general. The resilvering process is hard on all the remaining drives for an extended period of time.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So you're saying I should be running RAIDz2 instead of RAIDz1? You're probably right. 😂

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I made that switch a few years ago for that reason.

That said, as the saying goes, RAID is not a backup, it should never be the thing that stands between you having and losing all your data. RAID is effectively just one really dependable hard drive, but it's still a single point of failure.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

So you're saying I should be running JBOD with backups instead of RAIDz1? You're probably right. 🤭

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

As long as you're ok with it being way less dependable, and having to rebuild it from scratch more often 😉.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

I don't know if you're talking about the sample of cases you've personally witnessed, or the population of all NASes in the world. If the former, that sounds significant. If the latter, it sounds like it's probably not something to worry about.