this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
278 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3309 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This law essentially gives special rights to corporate news websites. It allows them to have the benefits of being public source (indexing, sharing, previews, accessibility etc.) but they can choose not to bare the costs of public information. This shitty law should have been a copyright framework ammendment that applies to all IP but instead it's a clear example of regulatory capture.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you mean they can choose not to bear the costs of public information?

Every law ever created should have been better

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

People opposed to a link tax are opposed to the concept, not the implementation.