Malicious Compliance

19547 readers

3 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.
We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.
We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

398

Businesses can discriminate against their customers? Alright then... (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by minimar@lemmy.world to c/maliciouscompliance@lemmy.world

162 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Money is speech, right? Does that make the ramifications of this decision go a lot farther? I don't see how yet, but it seems like this ruling may have broad impacts when people start getting creative with it...

[–] meteotsunami@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bold assuming the corrupted six ever used anything close to consistency to inform their rulings.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I mean, there's one thing that's pretty consistent: they'll do whatever their wealthy backers want them to do.

[–] PillowTalk420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

money is speech, right?

I mean, they do say that "money talks" and last time I checked, talking is a form of speech.