51
submitted 9 months ago by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/foss@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Apparently, Stallman is a net positive for them, so they keep him.

Doesn't mean that they in any way endorse pedophilia.

And the freedom of association also doesn't mean that a bunch of enraged people online have the freedom to decide whom they associate with.

And apparently, in the USA there is a whole party devoted to child marriage and other ways to have sex with minors. That might be the better point to start, because they actually have a say regarding laws on that matter.

[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 10 points 9 months ago

And apparently, in the USA there is a whole party devoted to child marriage and other ways to have sex with minors. That might be the better point to start, because they actually have a say regarding laws on that matter.

i'm not sure why we're acting as if condemning Richard Stallman and the Republican Party for their equally bad takes in this sphere are mutually exclusive of each other.

this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
51 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17718 readers
24 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS