Valve is trying to escape Microsoft's monopolistic practices with Linux while out performing their competition in a fair market. I like competition but I don't get what advantage steam has that their competition doesn't. Even with the steam deck they're using standardized hardware and open source software to make a competitive product leaving room for competition to create their own versions.

[–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Steam has a large userbase, which offers a lot of consumer inertia to prefer games on Steam. They also have a policy where game pricing on other platforms cannot undercut Steam.

The main complaint is that this pricing policy coupled with the consumer inertia makes it difficult for other gaming marketplaces to enter the market. You cannot undercut steam unless a publisher wants to not put their game on Steam at all (which would be suicide for anything but the largest titles), so you have to sell at Steam's price point. Few platforms could match Steams' established workshop, multiplayer, streaming, and social services; all of which benefit from costs at scale and the established user content.

Imagine trying to convince a user: "Buy your game here instead. It will cost the same as on Steam. No, you won't have access to the existing Workshop. No, you won't have in-platform multiplayer with your Steam friends." Even if you had feature parity, people would prefer Steam since that's where their existing games and friends are.

[–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Note that the main argument Wolfire is making is that game marketplaces (buy/download the game) and game platforms (online features, mod distribution, social pages) need to be decoupled. By integrating the two, Steam is vertically integrating, amortizing the cost, and then forcing every other marketplace to bear the cost of a platform in their pricing.

If you bought a game and paid for platform services separately, then competition can better exist for both of those roles. Which is good for consumers.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I’m going to be real, the seperatization might be good technically from a consumer standpoint, but mostly will just prove to make consumers lives harder for no reason. One of the major benefits of Steam is that it handles everything, and isn’t something I, or anyone else, would be happy to give up.

[–] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

I typically try to buy games from gog if available and on epic if not and steam if it's on sale. The only harm I see is how janky the other storefronts are and how frequently they break or refuse to load and that's not steams fault. I don't play a lot of online games but epic and gog are my primary platforms to play on.

I'm not defending steam but I also don't see how the advantage a platform like steam has is a direct result of any anti consumer practices. Honestly I prefer a storefront over rootkits and heavy handed drm any day not to mention downloading gamepatches directly from the publishers website.

[–] Rose@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (3 children)

One can appreciate Valve's contributions to Linux gaming without idealizing them. The likely reason they went for Linux is that they would have to pay Microsoft to use Windows.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

This is true that it is a likely reason. It is also possible that Gabe Newell runs his company in a very deliberate way because he thinks it's a net benefit to both his company and gaming in general. From what I have heard, which of course may be a flawed understanding of the man, it seems like he has certain principles. I guess the question is whether or not a person believes intent matters or only the end result.

[–] steelrat@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Their VR is all open as well for the good of the universe. Perhaps have a little deeper look.

[–] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I don't idealize them, I use the other storefronts (gog epic) potentially more because they often don't sell games with any form of drm. I just don't get it because as far as my experience goes they're all about the same minus more jank on the other two.

I've actually spent the most time with Rockstar games launcher thanks to GTA V and RDR2 and that one is a real piece of work tbh.

[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Years of experience. It's like wow. When your audienfe is so entrenched other MMOs can't compete