this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
707 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59207 readers
3234 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google Chrome will limit ad blockers starting June 2024::The "Manifest V3" rollout is back after letting tensions cool for a year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 97 points 11 months ago (4 children)

If only there was an alternative. Some kinda fox. A fox that was set aflame

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Or, let's say, a weasel frozen in ice

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There's a browser called Glacier Ferret? 🤔

[–] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Why would you apologise for that string of masterpieces? It's marvellous and adorable! Marvorable! Adorallous! Both! 🥰

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Those are awesome

[–] ReginaPhalange@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

OMFG Someone pleaae fork FF and make this one a reality

[–] Huschke@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Or - ohh I don't know - some kind of frozen bird?

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

I wish it was for me, but Chrome is necessary for some work I do.

Edit: very weird I get so many downvotes because I need to use a specific browser. Get out more, please.

[–] the_q@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

I was doing some work on the social security site and the site i needed wouldn't even load unless it was chrome or edge. There are sadly too many important website that are somehow allowed to gatekeep browsers. I feel like if their site follows guidelines then there's no reason they should be restricted from browsers, but here we are.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Platforms I use don't work reliably with other browsers, online teaching ones to be specific.

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 7 points 11 months ago

Ah, that's a tough one.

I needed to install Ungoogled Chromium to join lectures, because the remote learning site refused to work in Firefox (wouldn't be surprised if it was developed against a chrome-specific API)

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Pretty much every internal Web application I've used in banking, insurance and Govt orgs.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Most of the time the site doesn't really need chrome, it's just that's all they test it with, so they say it's a requirement.

There's an addon for Firefox called User-Agent Switcher and Manager that allows you to have Firefox identify itself to websites as chrome (among others), and it often fixes the problem.

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I work in IT so I am aware of this. Maybe you've not worked in enough places that just build incompatible (cr)apps?

And sure, just go outside our locked down machine policies and install Firefox and unapproved extensions. That will do down well.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, "most" was probably a bit hyperbolic, especially for internal websites, and I guess it's no surprise that the sectors you mentioned would be particularly bad for it.

The best place for my little PSA probably wasn't in response to your post in particular.

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Sorry I'm snippy as I have personal stuff going on. You are right in so far as if you have full control of your machine which isn't the case for the orgs I mentioned.

We can pull FF into our dev environment so I've seen these annoying behaviours.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

All good; I didn't think about your comment thoroughly enough before replying, and you had a very valid point! ^^

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Edit: ...

Yeah, I get "Google bad", and agree, and am 100% on the Firefox train, but downvoting people for not using FF is kinda stinky.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So use Chrome for that work, and Firefox plus an adblocker for everything else.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago

My adblocker works in Chrome at the moment so will see.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Have you tried to spoof the user agent ?

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's a neat trick that's been around for ages. Your browser presents a string of text to the website to identify itself. "Hi! I'm Chrome_ver_whatever."

You can easily change it, make your browser lie to the website.

Here's the extension for Chrome and Edge:

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/user-agent-switcher-for-c/djflhoibgkdhkhhcedjiklpkjnoahfmg

I'm sure Firefox has the same.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I'm not sure that's going to fix the technical problems I have.

[–] REM0VED@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Laughing out loud longitudinally?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Limits of Large Language (model not included)

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 2 points 11 months ago

Languishing Overcooked Linguine, Literally?