this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
2394 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59593 readers
2967 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

First RCS now this, today has been wild

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Does this also mean Google will let me uninstall Chrome from my Android device? Or is this only about PC's?

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hope we will get there too. Be able to fully install and uninstall Google services.

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hope the ability to install whatever OS on your phone that you want will become mandated and the default for all cell phones.

[–] daYMAN007@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if this was allowed. Surely most apps wont run anymore in the name of security

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Not really, most OS for phones are android based anyway. Having the choice of an ungoogled android is always a plus, much like many people just want an ungoogled chrome

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is unenforceable really. Android is a monolithic OS, it's very architecture would have to be reengineered, and then phone manufacturers would have to design their system drivers to be independent and distributable.

Windows is modular, this comes from the standard BIOS that came out of the bios wars in the 80's. Having a standard hardware interface enables this.

Phones don't have this.

No it's not, just mandate unlocked or user-unlockable bootloaders, the open source Android dev community will do the rest. There would be degoogled custom ROMs and full linux (eg Ubuntu touch, postmarketOS, etc.) ports for every reasonably popular device within months.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can already do that if you buy a phone that is compatible with LineageOS or other open source ROMs.

[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think their point was that all manufacturers should be forced to allow that

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well that would be nice of course, but won't ever happen because manufacturers are all over the world and there's no global law or regulation that could enforce that as a requirement.

What I suggested is still the current best option consumers have.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Globally, it's impossible to force a company to do anything. But, with key markets forcing manufactures to comply, most companies decide to go the "well, i'll make it so for everyone then" route, as it can be cheaper in the long run.

[–] scrooge101@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's already possible either by using a custom ROM or by connecting to a PC and using adb.

[–] SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We shouldn't have to rely on 3rd parties for that.

[–] wookiepedia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

ADB is very much 1st party.

[–] histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Android debug bridge very 3rd party /s

[–] viking@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago

Chrome browser? I could uninstall that right away.