this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
175 points (94.4% liked)

World News

39402 readers
2285 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.K. paper confirmed it had removed the letter because of its sudden surge in popularity on TikTok and other social media sites.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] samokosik@lemmynsfw.com 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Despite the fact that bin Laden is a stupid terrorist that should be removed, I don't believe in any form of censorship and don't see why it cannot be published.

Though some people can be stupid enough to start supporting terrorism afterwards...

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Though some people can be stupid enough to start supporting terrorism afterwards…

I used to think the same thing. Then my company got United Healthcare Insurance. Now I'm questioning. Would I have been angry if Osama had attacked their board of directors? I'm not so sure.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Evil conveniently never harms other evil things.

I swear not a single (primary) country leader died during covid. Even fat kim jong-un somehow made it out alive. Granted it wasn't a particularly lethal virus, but man it would have been satisfying to see some dictators kick the bucket.

[–] JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

A virus cannot be evil, a virus is just a virus. But, I get your sentiment.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How many primary country leaders are there?

Here's a list of notable people, mostly politicians, that died of covid. It's quite long.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_deaths_due_to_COVID-19

[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just look at the ages as you scroll down. They're mostly all 70 plus, people that age are looking for an excuse to die.

[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Odd how I've lost so many friends (in the mutiples of 10, dont care to count exactly)to an opiod crisis not worth doing anything effective about, but they blew the entire economy over a cold that hasn't killed anyone I know in 4 provinces and 3 states (was a trucker, know people everywhere, lived in 3 provinces and one state). tHats aNEcdoTAl tHoUgH

[–] ohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm sorry you've lost so many friends.

[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It fucking sucks. Yeah I used to like to party, but backed the hell off in like 2016 when it became clear everything was tainted. Been watching my old friends that wouldn't/couldn't, die ever since.

[–] Discoslugs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't believe in any form of censorship

You don't believe CSAM should be reported and removed from websites?

Cuz thats censorship as well.

[–] samokosik@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What I meant is censorship in terms of opinions on topics. We should be presented with both sides imo

I should have written it in a clearer manner

[–] 0xD@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

There is no "both sides", there is an infinite amount of opinions and perspectives on one thing: reality. Not all of those opinions are worth engaging with or deserve a platform.

Though in this case with the letter it's historically significant and I find their reasoning kind of pathetic, so I agree with you here.

[–] Seventhlevin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think they've taken it down merely because The Guardian doesn't want to be associated with the dumbfuck lemmites et al. who will read it and think "This Osama is a swell guy"