Today I Learned (TIL)

6556 readers

1 users here now

You learn something new every day; what did you learn today?

/c/til is a community for any true knowledge that you would like to share, regardless of topic or of source.

Share your knowledge and experience!

Rules

Information must be true
Follow site rules
No, you don't have to have literally learned the fact today
Posts must be about something you learned

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Kokomheart@lemmy.ca

JCSpark@lemmy.ca

TIL that in 1968, Liechtenstein held a referendum on women's suffrage where both men and women were allowed to vote. Despite this, the No-side won with 56.3% of the total and 49.5% of the women vote (en.wikipedia.org)

submitted 1 year ago by garfaagel@sh.itjust.works to c/til@lemmy.ca

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Women's suffrage would not be introduced in Liechtenstein until 1984.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nigeria

It's not a democratic process then by definition.

mail-in votes technically don't meet the criteria

Now that's a valid point. But how bold to assume, the vote was lost because men forced their women to use mail-in. In reality, reasons are much more complex.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not a democratic process then by definition.

Secret ballot is not a prerequisite for a democratic process. The UK has numbered ballots allowing courts to, in exceptional circumstances, order the reveal of what someone has voted (violating the secret ballot). But we don't claim their voting process is undemocratic.

But how bold to assume, the vote was lost because men forced their women to use mail-in.

I never assumed this. I'm merely pointing out that the secret ballot is not an automatic given in a democratic election.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Secret ballot is not a prerequisite for a democratic process.

What? Of course it is. Hence: "The secret ballot became commonplace for individual citizens in liberal democracies worldwide by the late 20th century.".

The UK has numbered ballots

secret != anonymous ... OPs argument mainly dismissed confidentiality.

But we don't claim their voting process is undemocratic.

we certainly would if no one checked the number of people simultaniously using a voting booth.

I never assumed this.

Sorry, didn't mean to imply that. I meant OPs argument.