this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
427 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59207 readers
3055 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
427
Google sues people who “weaponized” DMCA to remove rivals’ search results (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by Salamendacious@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Google yesterday sued a group of people accused of weaponizing the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to get competitors' websites removed from search results. Over the past few years, the foreign defendants "created at least 65 Google accounts so they could submit thousands of fraudulent notices of copyright infringement against more than 117,000 third-party website URLs," said Google's lawsuit filed in US District Court for the Northern District of California.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

DMCA is such a shitty law. But companies like Google choose the safe route and believe every DMCA claim without first using humans to investigate them (because that will cost more money), and this is the result.

Isn't that because Google would be liable if they ignored DMCA claims and a judge found in favor of the claimant?

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

Only if they're wrong, but yea. The risk vs reward is massively against the favor of standing up for a defendant

[–] drahardja@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, it’s all about incentives. Google’s behavior is what the law incentivizes.