Anarchist Memes

1202 readers

1 users here now

This forum is for anarchists to circlejerk and share zesty memes

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

theloneforager@lemmy.ml

304

Capitalism can't be anarchism (feddit.de)

submitted 1 year ago by anarchotoothbrushist@lemmy.ml to c/completeanarchy@lemmy.ml

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ssboomman@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not a liberal you dumbass
Everyone knows the difference between private and personal property
You absolutely can protect private property without a government. If someone ownes a factory, or extra houses for rent, or access to a natural resource like water, or even infrastructure, and someone else rightfully tries to take it from them, and they patrol it with a gun to defend it, is that somehow using a government? No? Then shut the fuck up you breaindead fucking donkey.

You are wrong. Literally just objectively wrong. Stop showing your ass. Go read some therory and maybe some history. Governments has never been the only way to protect private property. Private militias, private security forces, and other forms of non government violence have always been used.

[–] StrayCatFrump@slrpnk.net -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You are just trying to posture and distract from the fact that you asserted one idiot with a gun can protect private property (thus demonstrating that fact that no: you don't even know what private property is.), you ignorant, liberal moron.

[–] ssboomman@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

An idiot with a gun can protect private property. If someone owns land that they own for the sake of generating profit, ie private property, and they protect it by grabbing a gun to keep people off of it, that is literally using a gun to protect private property. Saying that that situation is impossible is fucking moronic. I’ve never seen someone so confidently incorrect.

It’s ok man. Reading is hard. There was no distractions or posturing. Go reread the last comment and try your best to reply to bullet point number 3. Come to terms that you were wrong and move on. You just look like a dumbass

[–] StrayCatFrump@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you're just like, quadrupling down or so on the fact that you have no idea what private property is now. And want to project onto other people confident incorrectness.

Clearly there's no point continuing this with an ignorant liberal troll. GFYS.

[–] ssboomman@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If someone owns land with the intent of exploiting labor for profit that land is private property.

If they buy a gun to keep people off that property and personally patrol it to ensure that’s property’s safely they are protecting private property.

If they do it without the use of a government or a governing agency they are protecting private property without a government.

Therefore it is possible to protect private property without a government.

If you can’t comprehend that, you’re a moron. You don’t need a central government to protect private property, you just need violence, albeit the correct form of violence. Next time do some reading and learn a few things before you try to correct someone.

So like I said earlier, a dude with a gun can protect private property.