this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
223 points (91.8% liked)

Movies

7528 readers
9 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Well if it didn't meet your expectations, don't keep it so high for these movies.

I've been seeing this sentiment a lot and it's such a shitty take.

Basically you're saying, "If a movie isn't liked, it's the fault of the viewer." since the only option it leaves is, "Continue lowering your expectations until you're happy with whatever you end up getting."

[–] EGG_CREAM@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I mean, if you keep watching these movies, and you keep getting disappointed by them, it is your fault. You're still giving them money to make a movie you basically know you're not going to like, based on recent data. Either stop watching, lower your expectations, or just always be disappointed.

[–] w3dd1e@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk. It’s a little bit of both right? I mean if you go see Pride and Prejudice because you want to see some epic fight scenes, you’re going to be disappointed.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Nah that seems like more of a strawman or moving the goalposts than anything remotely reflective of the actual situation.

Nobody is criticizing this movie because they went into it expecting an oscar-bait period romantic drama. Nobody.

Literally every single person knew what the movie was supposed to be: a superhero movie. An action/adventure movie with excitement, a few mild scares, some laughs, explosions, fights, etc. Sure, within the genre there can be "light-hearted, mostly comedy romp" and "dark, gritty, shades of grey" tones of film within it, but zero people are walking into this one expecting Pride and Prejudice, and it's silly at best to suggest otherwise.

So when we're talking about expectations, we're not talking about the overall genre or tone expectations, we're talking about expectations as to how well executed, well acted, well written, and well thought out the various elements were.

So yeah, when people say they found it disappointing, not being up to their expectations, they mean as a superhero movie. Further, given the steady diet they've been fed of the same, they mean, specifically, "up to the expectation set by many, many other similar films in the genre, in the same umbrella IP, from the same studio, released in the same broad time period.

It really doesn't get a whole lot more apples-to-apples than expectations for a Disney/Marvel superhero movie in the 2020s.

So no, sorry, I can't buy the angle that "if the film didn't meet your expectations, it's your unreasonable expectations that are to blame because you didn't know what kind of movie it was supposed to be".

Further, even if that were the case, that wouldn't be so much lowering expectations as changing them. So when we see people specifically use the word "lower", it suggests that's not what they're thinking at all.

[–] meter_kilo@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you think they make movies without caring if it would be good ? All those people, all that money invested and they don't care for returns. Obviously not. They want returns and they try to make a good movie.

In the case of Marvel movies people keep their expectations so high that even decent movies like The Marvels is shit to them. That's definitely the fault of the high expectations.

Again, I'm not saying it is the best movie. But it definitely doesn't deserve the hatred it is getting.

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

obviously not

On the other hand, do you think every movie is made with love and attention to detail or do you think some are shoved out there because they think people are dumb enough to just hand money over? Obviously not, in my opinion—many movies are phoned in. Many sequels, and evidence suggests all known “cinematic universes” tell a ramshackle and uninspired story in hopes that viewers of the original material are attached enough to the characters that they come back for more, instead of trying a new story with new characters.

Nobody is obliged to appreciate a movie simply for existing. It wasn’t a gift.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

No it’s more like “I don’t need it to be a goddamn Oscar winner to enjoy it”. It’s not blaming the viewer, it’s just saying that it still has good reasons to exist and if you have higher standards, off you go instead of just shitting on it in its entirety