11
submitted 10 months ago by flumph@programming.dev to c/rpg@ttrpg.network
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 2 points 10 months ago

I guess as the devil's advocate, the publisher put out both. So it seemed like it was the high-effort way to both create a bespoke system, and appeal to the people who are completely stuck on D&D.

Lowering HP would absolutely go a long way, you're right. I think limiting or disabling multiclassing would also help, but that would be an extremely unpopular change that most people would ignore anyway. :/

[-] anlumo@ttrpg.network 2 points 10 months ago

"Beneath the Monolith" was also put out by the same company that produced the original setting with its bespoke system (Numenera/Cypher System). They just know which way the wind blows and strive to maximize their profits.

Multiclassing is an optional rule in D&D5e, not allowing it should not be controversial.

[-] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 1 points 10 months ago

You're right that multiclassing an optional rule, but in practice, I think nearly every player assume it's in use unless the DM says otherwise (and they will likely complain if the DM says otherwise). So I'd bet that if a ruleset basedo n 5e disabled multiclassing, people would either complain about it, or ignore that part and then complain when it breaks the game.

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
11 points (78.9% liked)

rpg

3062 readers
1 users here now

This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs

Rules (wip):

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS