658
Mozilla tells extension developers to get ready to go mobile • The Register
(www.theregister.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
658 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
58165 readers
3316 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
As if extensions is the reason of Firefox faltering on mobile. Do Chrome and Safari allow extensions on mobile?
Safari does. I think they’re the same as desktop Safari but it seems like a different and smaller ecosystem from the Chrome/FF one and the good ones tend to cost a dollar or two (or six). Still, I have an ad-blocker, a dark mode one, a Userscripts one, one to get rid of AMP links, and a few others.
Oh nice! I didn't know.
Safari actually has a pretty good extension system (for mobile)
It's a bunch of things. Not having extensions however removed a potentially differentiating feature, which certainly didn't help.
But mobile Firefox does have extensions. It's just not a big number.
I just counted, it's 22... and there a lot of redundancy in there. So I'd say that FF on mobile had extensions technically. Want something as extreme as RES or some video downloader? You have with fiddle with nightly... which barely any average user would.
True, and that's why they are opening it up.