this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
162 points (77.0% liked)

World News

39364 readers
2239 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was responding with a source to show money has less meaning in socialism. We tend to view China through a capitalist lens. They have different priorities and goals.

[–] Hereforpron2@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really. Globally, money still brings power. They have incredibly capitalistic international trade and relations.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Globally, because capitalism currently runs the world. But not internally. Billionaires regularly have their capital reappropriated.

[–] Hereforpron2@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And the article you're commenting on is about their global share of gold. So, rather than just propagandistic, I guess your pro-China rhetoric is also irrelevant here.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I changed the link to cover China’s policy of common prosperity. I do propagandize, but not for China. I’m trying to counter war drums the media is beating. I don’t want a war with China, do you?

[–] Hereforpron2@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago