rpg

3150 readers

21 users here now

This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs

Rules (wip):

Do not distribute pirate content
Do not incite arguments/flamewars/gatekeeping.
Do not submit video game content unless the game is based on a tabletop RPG property and is newsworthy.
Image and video links MUST be TTRPG related and should be shared as self posts/text with context or discussion unless they fall under our specific case rules.
Do not submit posts looking for players, groups or games.
Do not advertise for livestreams
Limit Self-promotions. Active members may promote their own content once per week. Crowdfunding posts are limited to one announcement and one reminder across all users.
Comment respectfully. Refrain from personal attacks and discriminatory (racist, homophobic, transphobic, etc.) comments. Comments deemed abusive may be removed by moderators.
No Zak S content.
Off-Topic: Book trade, Boardgames, wargames, video games are generally off-topic.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Avogadro@ttrpg.network

sirblastalot@ttrpg.network

TripHammer@ttrpg.network

Primarch@ttrpg.network

BrentTaylor@ttrpg.network

Mecha rpg : Apocalypse frame vs beam saber (vs lancer (vs mekton Z) ) ? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works to c/rpg@ttrpg.network

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hi Folks, I took itch Games for Gaza bundle. Among the games in the bundle, I've seen 2 mecha games, Apocalypse frame and Beam saber, I believe the first one is a PTBA and the second a FITD, I have no opinon on these "system family", it's vague enough that it can lead to a good or bad game.

I've been considering running a mecha game, for a while. Last time I played a mecha campaign it was a Mekton Z (at the time when code geass was the popular anime). I've even downloaded the free version of lancer, but only had a quick look (and the fact that atribute have weird 2-3 letter name like LL gave me the impression it's a complicated game). Now, I have a few games on my "pdf library" and need to choose one to read in details. These last years I focused mostly on one-shot/mini campaign (10-20 sessions once every 2 weeks)

I am not really sure which direction to take. I am too old to spend a whole session on a fight, and traditionally, I am more a Mystery/investigation GM. Mecha wise, I like how Macross feature the duality between artists and fighter offering two ambiances in one, while I love how Gundam isn't just good versus evil (and then I really enjoyed Geass, but it's not really a mecha anime). RPG wise, on the sci-fi games I GMed a lot of fading suns, and some Eclipse phase (the example of a game with a great setting but a bad system)

i haven't checked in details the setting of the 3 games from my thread, but it seems they're semi setting agnostic. I might re-use some element from Eclipse phase and focus on the solar system rather than a whole galaxy.

Any opinion on these system/settings and which one I should choose (beside reading 3 times a 300 pages manual to decide ?)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve only played Lancer, it’s very much d&d with mechs: you customise your equipment, roll d20s, and have tactical combat on a grid

I am not really sure whetherD&D& with mec is supposed to tell the game is good, or bad ? I don't like D&D in general for too much focus on combat, ignoring the rest, and as someone who grew up with Vampire and Shadowrun, I am no fan of single dices system especially on the crunchy side (I like to call shadowrun a diesel engine, it's heavy to start with, but once you're started it runs smoothly)

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Good and bad are pretty subjective based on what you like. If you don't like d&d because it's too combat-focused then you probably won't like Lancer for the same reason, that doesn't make it bad but it's probably not for you.