this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
95 points (89.9% liked)
Games
32463 readers
1050 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Instead of a zelda game, they gave us mid legos and 10 fps. I dont understand how anyone thought it was playable.
Its an expansion for botw, at best.
Not being playable is a bit extreme, it's just boring and tedious, and steps back on its extreme design choices of the predecessor
To me, the stutters down to single-digits made it unplayable. Good for those that perservered?
If you want to disqualify games for quest-breaking glitchiness at launch, BG3 gets disqualified before TotK does.
Meh, BG3 was playable for me. It might be a case of simply being able to throw more power at it, but im indifferent to the why.
At least I could experience one of the games.
Not sure BG3 is my GOTY either, but i dont work in the industry anymore so dont really need to be concerned with it.