662
submitted 10 months ago by gkd@lemmy.ml to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] catacomb@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago

I think it's a maturity thing. You eventually see so many trends come and go, peaks and troughs of hype cycles and some developers (probably including yourself at least once!) overusing certain new tech.

You eventually discover what works with current tech and then you can become healthily critical of anything new. You see it more for where it can fit and where it can't.

If you have something small and stateless then serverless is easy and, more importantly, scalable. It was a little easier to see its role once the hype fog had lifted and I had a problem to solve with it.

[-] dan@upvote.au 3 points 10 months ago

see so many trends come and go

It's interesting how things are cyclical. Serverless functions remind me of cgi-bin scripts.

[-] catacomb@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

Yep, it's usually an existing idea with progression in a few areas. You could definitely achieve serverless with a cluster of servers hosting the same scripts in cgi-bin and I think that context helps to put it into perspective.

[-] dan@upvote.au 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I feel like I should start a "serverless" startup that's just Apache running in a Kubernetes cluster with a bunch of cgi-bin scripts in a Ceph cluster. Boom, serverless with high availability.

[-] folkrav@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

If you only focus on the concept of a serverless function and forego 99% of the other stuff, yeah 😛

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
662 points (97.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

32069 readers
2234 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS