Technology

59605 readers

3498 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1682

The average car purchased in 2023 emits higher levels of carbon dioxide (CO₂) than its 2013 equivalent. This is due to the large proportion of SUVs in the mix, which tend to be bigger and heavier. (english.elpais.com)

submitted 1 year ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

370 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

also interesting is how few car makers even produce normal sized cars anymore, let alone smaller ones.

From the article...

"SUVs and crossovers were traditionally less fuel efficient and more expensive, but that's not the case anymore. Engine and technology advancements have leveled those drawbacks. SUVs and crossovers are now just as fuel efficient and offer more hauling capability as similar-sized cars for about the same price in many cases,"

So, who do I believe?

[–] FeelThePoveR@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Engine and technology advancements" can also be applied to smaller cars so that doesn't really move the needle anywhere.

I think it's quite obvious that unless you discover how to break the laws of physics, the smaller car will be always more efficient due to better aerodynamics and lower weight.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

the smaller car will be always more efficient due to better aerodynamics and lower weight.

Be interesting to know how much different the two were, if the difference was minimal, or very large.

If it's minimal, and you need the carrying capacity, then it wouldn't be such a bad thing to own a SUV.

If it's not minimal, yeah then it's better just renting an SUV size vehicle when you need to carry something of large capacity. Unless you need that capacity each and every day, then it would be cost prohibitive to rent versus own.

[–] random65837@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

There's nothing to not believe, look up the fuel averages. My wife's Escape averages 40mpg.