this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
43 points (80.3% liked)

Games

16703 readers
1065 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
43
The most controversial Assassin's Creed Mirage graphical setting is being removed for all players (www.pcgamesn.com)
submitted 1 year ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, I get that aspect. It's just an objectively better experience without the artifacts of the technical limitls of a physical camera and lens.

It's as if it's driven by an idiot that thinks if it looks like there are lens flares, abberation, vignette, etc. that it was look cinematographic, completely ignoring the actual art of composition, framing, lighting, depth of field, etc... the actual arts of cinematography.

Though, given that I'm the one controlling the vital camera with my mouse or controller, apparently it should suck as much as a real camera.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Objectively is becoming the new literally

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I used objectively literally.

Avoiding flares, aberration etc makes an image objectively better. You might subjectively prefer either the objectively better or objectively worse image.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol it's literally an "objectively better experience" and if your experience was different then you're literally objectively wrong.

Look sorry about the sass, I know know I'm being a pedantic ass right now. But experience is by definition subjective. If you specified that the image clarity was objectively better, well then you'd be totally right. But that's not what you said.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry you're being a pedantic ass too.