this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
1345 points (100.0% liked)

196

16488 readers
1692 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
qaz@lemmy.world
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
qaz@lemmy.ca
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Qaz@lemmy.ml
qaz@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org
1345
AI rule (media.infosec.exchange)
submitted 1 year ago by Masimatutu@lemm.ee to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
193 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

source

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] trolololol@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Disney doesn't agree

Now I'm pretty sure they won't see a conflict of interest in not using their IP to train AI but advocating for your data for training.

[โ€“] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The inverse is also true. Disney will make their own AI regardless of being able to use anyone else's data for training. Because they have a ton of data already. The only ones that will be shafted if that freedom is restricted is that those without a library of data to train will have no access to AI.