this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
242 points (86.9% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2795 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely, I won't take the IDF's account, I want confirmation. However before you commented with your video /u/stankmut@lemmy.world claimed that there were photos showing that the building in your video is the adjacent building. Presumably there are two halls that use the church wall that was collapsed. I've not disputed that the air strike damaged the church and caused unnecessary civillian casualties. I'm disputing that the church was targeted.

Furthermore, your video appears to show a part of the church, still standing.

The IDF lie through their asses, but that doesn't mean everything they say is a lie. I'm after the objective truth, which requires considering all accounts and not dismissing them out of hand just because of the source. The best lies have elements of truth, after all.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Completely reasonable and still getting downvoted.

Far as Lemmy is concerned you need to take a very specific stance on this conflict, and any other reasonable and honest thread of thought is instantly rejected.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fortunately upvotes and downvotes on Lemmy don't mean much.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course they don’t matter. But it gives you an idea of where people’s heads are at.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes indeed, but they mattered much more on reddit. If you didn't have enough upvotes you couldn't post or comment in some subs, and if you were heavily downvoted in a subreddit you got comment rate limited - so if you went against the grain people would downvote you to silence your dissenting voice and prevent an actual conversation. Also downvoted comments weren't just lower down the page, they were often minimised, although that wasn't necessarily a bad thing.

Case in point, I've been arguing with people on lemmygrad today, and of course I'm getting heavily downvoted. If it was reddit I wouldn't even be able to reply after the first couple comments.