this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
547 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59287 readers
4458 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Some Walmart employees say customers are getting hostile at self-checkout — and they blame anti-theft tech::When Walmart's anti-theft self-checkout tech alerts an employee of a missed scan, it can cause some uncomfortable situations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The store has chosen to save money by pushing work onto customers via a buggy robot overlord.

Employees are the only person you can complain to.

Just more billionaires making things shitty for everyone.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I could justify it if even a fraction of a percent of the savings were actually passed on, or hell, even distributed to the few employees they still have. But no, it lines the fat cats pockets.

[–] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

That's the worst part. It has gotten so miserable for both employees and customers and none of the profits made from these changes has gone back to those most affected by them.

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I do agree that complaining to employees is useless, but it's also a really frustrating situation and it's not like you can get the CEO on the phone to complain. I wouldn't personally complain at an employee, but I do get how someone might in the midst of such frustration.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As a consumer, what’s your other option?

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Pretty much nothing, hence why I said I get it 🤷🏼‍♂️

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The only viable legal option is to vote with your wallet. I know elsewhere you said that's not an option in your area, and that sucks. Still, do what you can to shop at other places, even if you can't nix walshart entirely.

Edit that was another guy who said that, my bad. Statement still standa tho

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where? Idk about your area, but in mine all the options are big corporate chains

And even in areas where family owned retail stores still survive, a lot of people can't afford to shop at them, because they'll always have higher prices than the big chains, and with the price gouging that's gone on since 2020, many families are struggling to make ends meet as it is.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it sucks for sure. I personally choose to spend a bit more and buy a bit less to go to somewhere that doesn't suck horribly, but that's a lot of effort and a privilege that others may not have. I'll never condemn a person for shopping at walshart, due to that. Still though, shop elsewhere when you can, buy minimal when you can't. That's about the only legal recourse we have as consumers.