this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
120 points (100.0% liked)

City Life

2114 readers
14 users here now

All topics urbanism and city related, from urban planning to public transit to municipal interest stuff. Both automobile and FuckCars inclusive.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You're looking at that right by the way. THREE freeway ramps!! I walked this last week and it was genuinely terrifying. The first freeway ramp when coming from the bus stop has NO pedestrian lights or signals.

Also those of you with good eyes will notice that there is NO SIDEWALK south of the bus stop. None. If you want to walk south on that particular street (which is 5 lanes btw) then you have to cross the freeway to get to the other side of the road.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sonori@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Is it bad it i think that this isn’t that bad at all?

I mean it would be nicer if the sidewalk continued on both sides sure, but freeway enterance ramps are typically about as hard for pedestrians to cross as roundabouts given the slow speed you need to take them and single direction of traffic. It looks like there are even marked crossings and a sidewak, so this walk is very much intended. The freeway itself is grade separated and so not a factor in any of this, and while the road is five lanes it’s a arterial road so that’s quite resonable.

[–] Gryzor@lemmyfly.org 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's really bad. Don't fool yourself. Typical layout of a car-centric design.

[–] sonori@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What would improve it in your view? I mean it’s an artery joining a freeway, there’s going to be cars.

[–] Schmeckinger@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least a small bridge over the multi lane street.

[–] pbjamm@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Proper ped/cycle infrastructure is at grade with cars doing the climbing.

[–] sonori@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

given the scale involved i don’t think you’d be tight on space with just a pedestrian ramp, much less rasing or lowering the road. Given how it’s just two lanes each way plus a turning lane i’d imagine a stoplight’s pedestrian cycle should be enough.

[–] Butterbee@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Putting a bus stop at those businesses on the other side would help.

[–] sonori@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

That comes at the cost of slowing down the bus for everyone for a two minute, plus waiting at stoplights, walk.

[–] Hillock@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The crossing to the bus stop is a nightmare, there isn't even a crosswalk there. And considering this is near the freeway ramps, I assume that 5 lane road is quite busy. The rest isn't that bad. But that one crossing definitely deserves an on-demand stop light or better yet a pedestrian bridge or underground passage.

[–] Overzeetop@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Are you looking at the same picture? I see a crosswalk from the bus stop side to the median at the nearest on-ramp access, then from that median to the sidewalk under the freeway.

It's clearly a lot of crossing to get to the bus stop, but the problem here is where the bus stops, not the current crossings provided. There are few other ways to provide non-grade access to a multi-lane freeway. I'm not sure of any which would be workable given the proximity of land use which prevents a cloverleaf, and the addition of one would probably make the crossing even more treacherous. If the bus were simply to add a stop on the (photographic) north side of the highway, up near the commercial entrance, that would be the nominal "solution" and require nothing more than a sign.

[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depends on driver behavior where you live, I think. I have zero confidence in marked pedestrian crossings, and expect everyone to take these kinds of ramps as fast as they possibly can, possibly while texting.

[–] pbjamm@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

As a cyclist/pedestrian always assume that, at best, drivers are indifferent to your well-being.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Is it bad it i think that this isn’t that bad at all?

My sweet, sweet summer child..

[–] bermuda@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're kind of right about the freeway being "as slow as a roundabout" but the third crossing is the worst because it's a slip road without a yield sign, so you have to rely on drivers actually looking at you and stopping for you. Fortunately traffic here is so bad that the stop light ahead usually results in cars being stuck all the way on the freeway, allowing you to cross between them. There is a crossing light for pedestrians but only pedestrians can see it, like one of the ✋ signals youd see in a city. The cars have no awareness on whether you're "allowed" to cross.

The slip road is made especially worse by being quite smooth and straight so instead of going the speed suggested by the signs (20 mph), most drivers go 40 or even 50 down the ramp before stopping or going for the stop light.

This is also true if you intend to stop there and cross the road to go south because there's no sidewalk on your side of the road. The second crossing is another freeway slip road. This one does have a yield sign but you still have to rely solely on drivers seeing you and actually caring enough to stop, which isn't great considering it's a semi-blind corner and they're already speeding up to go highway speeds.