this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
68 points (92.5% liked)
Games
16728 readers
556 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think it still is, it's just that game devs have found a recurring revenue model that works similarly to licensing: microtransactions.
I can see Disney wanting back in now that MTX is socially acceptable. Milking the same IP for decades is exactly their MO.
They could then just be a publisher for their own IP and outsource development work. Disney gets to own all copyrights and revenue and pick an independent studio most suited for each game. Buying something like EA for around a similar or higher price than Microsoft spends for Activision is just stupid.
Yeah, that makes sense too. I also wonder if they're interested in having a game distribution platform as well. That's in line with their Disney+ service they've been pushing. Buying EA means they get that and a bunch of popular games to seed it with.
I guess we'll see what they end up doing.