this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
157 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

59207 readers
3134 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Now that Google , FB wants to trap us and control every aspect of the Internet browsing, Is it even possible to break free.

Or creating new Internet is a unrealistic idea ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Seems like all we need is a search engine that only returns sites that don't shove unwanted content down your throat. Tall order though.

[–] lustrum@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've started using Duckduckgo, less specifically for the search and more for the bangs. Fed up of search surfacing sites they care about. I can now quickly search wikipedia with !w etc.

[–] Jamie@jamie.moe 7 points 1 year ago

I host my own searx instance and use that to search, it supports all of DDG's bangs by default if you begin a query with a double bang !!

[–] hardypart@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not advocating for Google here, but you can do that with "site: wikipedia.org" as a search operator in Google.

[–] vector_zero@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

DDG's bangs actually use the site's own search feature though, rather than narrowing the search engine's results to a given site.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And, less typing. That's a plus for me.

[–] lustrum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah but that's slower and not using the sites specific search

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

more for the bangs

desire to know more intensifies

[–] daredevil@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Bangs are awesome, and so are the Vim keybinds

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kagi has been amazing for me so far. I signed up as soon as they changed the pricing to allow unlimited searches at $10/mo.

I'm still working on my filters and promoting/demoting/pinning sites in my results, but it's already night-and-day better than Google and even DuckDuckGo (which still deserves much respect).

[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Looks promising if you're on a Mac/iOS setup, but I'm on Fedora Linux, so sadly they don't offer an option for that. If they ever offered Linux support in the future, I'd definitely give Kagi a try.

[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

People aren't putting content much on the open web as they used to as well. Think the high point was when blogs were a thing, the second high point was during the Geocities et all free webspace peroid.