this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
407 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59674 readers
2941 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Has anyone come up with a guess on the cost of swapping out an entire cast body section vs replacing or refurbishing the parts that would be there without the cast?

[–] w2qw@aussie.zone 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think point is without the cast body section you could just replace broken parts which may be significantly less. In practice though I don't think it matters that much. Small accidents hopefully don't damage the frame and if they do it's often a bit dubious repairing it.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah, I think once you get to the point where the car needs the frame worked on, it's probably going to get scrapped whether it has a cast frame or not.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

.. on a 1st world country.

we definetly do those kinds of repairs over here

[–] shadow@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm, yes. Some trucks with broken or bent frames get patched up and driven.

[–] pirat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Probably because trucks are industrial vehicles built to be driven millions of km*, and therefore are a much bigger investment, so the repair is more often "worth it" than for personal vehicles.

Also, one truck can have the cargo capacity of many cargo vans, and one bus in pendular movement has the capacity of many personal cars, so each truck/bus repair will have a greater impact.

*At least, that's the case for buses, according to a schoolbus driver when I was a kid.

[–] bemenaker@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is for cars and small SUVs. The trucks still have frames. The cars and small SUVs are already unibodies. Just not multi-segmented unibodies. The two differences are that its multi-segmented, and the metal is cast, instead of forged in a stamping press.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

people have repaired frames for a long time.

[–] epyon22@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What this seems like is it would replace things that are normally spot welded or glued together, things I can think off the top of my head that are like this are the front radiator support and strut towers in various cars. When these items are bent or rusted you can usually buy these peices. See skyline r34 strut tower rust issues. On this new proposed design your options would be to replace the whole front or rear third of your car, or precision cutting and welding a piece in, which may be inaccessable because of the casting design.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Now there I can see how this design might make more problems than it solves. Bending the mounts of different parts might total the car.

[–] Thetimefarm@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Welding a casting is a lot more dubious even if you can access it easily. If the original material was welded together chances are it can be rewelded without much issue. Most successfull welds in cast material I've seen have been in compression, it tends to split around the weld when you put it under tension.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is that you'd have to pretty much disassemble half the vehicle to replace a cast part, and that will be thousands extra in labor.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Considering that the cast part is practically half the vehicle, I wonder if it is easier to change out the cast vs several frame parts.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The frame is a much smaller portion of the vehicle than these cast parts.

Once a frame is damaged the vehicle often gets totalled out because it would be so much to replace, basically disassemble the vehicle or try to repair the frame and have poor safety risks from then on.

These casts are a lot more than where a frame is. Damage to the casts will happen from accidents that never would have damaged a normal frame.

[–] bemenaker@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Not on a unibody.

[–] epyon22@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

My guess is increase part cost but reduce repair labor. Similar to replacing transmission or engine today. Not worth it for a shop to usually do the repairs them selves but replace the whole unit and send off to a remanufacturing plant