Yes. It is utterly uncontroversial. Most people aspire to have some luxuries in their life. And people go the extra mile to afford them. The fact that some people are on welfare, which often effectively prohibits even small amounts of work those people might otherwise want to do, doesn't change that.

And who cares if some small proportion of people just want the basics and aren't willing to work more? Do you literally want to force them with death to make them work? Why? They don't want to be there, they're unhappy to be there, they aren't motivated, they aren't productive. And I don't blame them!

And now you think I’m not? Why? Because I didn’t roll over and agree with everything you said?

Because you responded to something easily observable with the brainless "doubt".

You are either trolling or just remarkably stupid. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And who cares if some small proportion of people just want the basics and aren't willing to work more?

Not "work more". Work at all. Because society needs people to work to function. Money doesn't grow on trees, it represents other people's time. If there's no time, there's no money. Money just becomes completely without value .

Do you literally want to force them with death to make them work?

What even the fuck are you talking about?

Because you responded to something easily observable with the brainless "doubt".

Buddy your position is the only thing here that's brainless.

You are either trolling or just remarkably stupid. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.

I see we're persisting with the personal insults. I think it's pretty clear you have no interest in an honest and productive discussion and simply desire to lambast those who disagree with you. I have no interest in such a discussion, so you can be gone, thanks.

[–] darq@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah piss off little troll.

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So can you, thanks.