this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
222 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

59243 readers
3452 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
222
How Ashton Kutcher’s ‘non-profit start-up’ makes millions from the EU’s fight against child abuse on the net (www.ftm.eu)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

How Ashton Kutcher’s ‘non-profit start-up’ makes millions from the EU’s fight against child abuse on the net::The ‘non-profit start-up’ Thorn, founded by actor Ashton Kutcher, is a driving force behind the EU’s campaign to scan the net for child abuse material. Newly public documents and financial information obtained by Follow the Money reveal the blurred boundaries between Thorn’s do-good public face and the powerful business behind it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It sounds like they have a database of CSAM images, so they're likely hashing parts of the suspected image or video and searching for that hash in the database

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right, so I guess the software is doing that prior to it being encrypted and sent.

Is the problem that it could do more than just scan for CSAM, ie. Anything that the government, or dictator, decides?

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's exactly the risk. There's no way to implement this type of client side scanning without building infrastructure that can then also be used to scan for other things.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This isn't like an anti-virus system. You can't just catalog them all. It's too easy to create. Hell, with the advent of LLMs and AI-generated images, it's going to be even easier to create.

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Too easy to create and too easy to foil the hash, unless it’s some kind of highly sophisticated feature-based hashing.