this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
881 points (100.0% liked)

196

16555 readers
1621 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
qaz@lemmy.world
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
qaz@lemmy.ca
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Qaz@lemmy.ml
qaz@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org
881
This (rule)s (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 year ago by RothyBuyak@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
173 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Yes we do

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Largely, yes. Bicycles are a better, healthier way to move distances longer than 100-ish meters, ideally are only powered by human effort and move at speeds low enough that accidents are absurdly unlikely.

[–] LucyLastic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that make it a bikeable city?

I live in Europe, not about to break out the bike to go less than a couple of km

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That too, but a walkable city by necessity also becomes a bikeable city.

[–] LucyLastic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I thought it was just funny that the term "walkable" for some people invokes the idea of using bikes