87
AMD FSR3 Hands-On: Promising Image Quality, But There Are Problems - DF First Look
(www.youtube.com)
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
87 points (97.8% liked)
Games
32513 readers
1497 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
For me latency is becoming the next issue. Based on Dlss3, not to mention you'll usually use it in conjunction with other latency damaging things like RTX, I don't think I'll ever use frame-gen. It's just very noticeable and makes it kind of pointless outside cutscenes for me.
Yeah, this is exactly where I'm at.
A large part of the reason I want higher framerates in the first place is that I want lower latency.
Higher framerates that actually make latency worse make no sense to me.
You make a very good point about cutscenes. I'd love if there there was a frame gen & upscaler that exclusively worked on pre-rendered cutscenes to fix the issues in older games of cutscenes looking way worse than gameplay. I know for popular titles, there are sometimes mods that replace the cutscenes videos with upscaled versions, not having to fuss around with that could be really neat. But for gameplay, I'd much rather play at even 50fps native with variable refresh, without artifacts or additional latency, than a faked 120fps that still runs at 60hz of latency with added artifacting.