this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
1042 points (96.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54772 readers
416 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

$25 to rent the movie, one watch within max 24 hours after you start watching it... Or $5 more to own it. Scammers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atomWood@lemm.ee 144 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Spending $30 to own a brand new movie that just came out is not something I have a problem with.

However, not being able to download a copy of the movie you purchased is where I take issue.

[–] Oneandonlyzach@sh.itjust.works 73 points 1 year ago (2 children)

$30 to own the movie is valid, but for $5 less, you're only allowed 1 watch within 24 hours of starting. Something like that shouldn't be basically the same price as the movie. With pricing like this, they basically force you to spend the extra $5. There isn't even a point to rent the movie and they know that.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When you said “cheaper” I was not expecting like NEARLY HALF THE PRICE

[–] somegadgetguy@lemdro.id 18 points 1 year ago

Yeah. I'm back to buying discs for the movies I want to support. Then I can always hang on to a copy no matter where it might live on streaming apps.

[–] atomWood@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

I absolutely agree! Renting a movie should cost nowhere near as much as purchasing the movie.

[–] pup_atlas@pawb.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you don’t get a physical piece of media that can be viewed offline indefinitely, you don’t own anything, you’re just renting. Services revoking even bought and paid for content is not unheard of, digital purchasing gives every streaming company the ability to do that.

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you don’t get a physical piece of media

It doesn't have to be physical

/pendantic

[–] tuoret@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would be rad if a service actually let you download a movie you purchased as an mkv file or something. Can't see it happening though

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yep companies love DRM!

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago

They are legally entitled to do so, sure.

Doesn't make up for the false implication that you are "purchasing" the movie in any commonly understood meaning of the word. And if there was any alternative where you own a full res digital format, maybe the outrage could be said to be misplaced, but there isnt, and it's not.