this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
1017 points (99.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

32461 readers
641 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bandwidth isn't really most of the issue. It's latency. It's the amount of time from the CPU requesting a segment of memory to receiving it, which bandwidth doesn't effect.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Depends on your workload and access pattern.

...I'm saying can be faster. Not is faster.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but the point of RAM is fast random (the R in RAM) access times. There are ways to make slower memory work better for this by predicting what will be needed (grab a chunk of memory because accesses will probably need things with closer locality than pure random), but it can't be fixed. Cloud memory is good for non-random storage or storage that isn't time critical.