this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
810 points (96.3% liked)

> Greentext

7533 readers
9 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LetsGoBrandon9982@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's scary how we seem to be getting closer and closer to 1984.

[–] jana@leminal.space 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Newspeak is intended to make more complex thoughts impossible. This isn't newspeak; they're still talking about the topics, they're just using dumb filter workarounds.

Though I do feel it'd be obnoxious to actually talk like this when not needed

[–] Flambo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Though I do feel it’d be obnoxious to actually talk like this when not needed

on the one hand, yes. on the other hand, my generation piloted the spoken use of "lol", "lmao", and their myriad variations in pronunciation. this strikes me as merely upholding that proud tradition.

[–] jana@leminal.space 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I suppose eventually I'll come around to accepting it, if it persists. But these are not the same; the intent behind them is different. "LOL" is an acronym, not a censorship workaround. Saying it out loud is purely ironic. Maybe the zoomers saying Tiktokisms out loud is also ironic (I've personally never heard it directly), but the reason it exists in the first place is stupid

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At first it was ironic, then it just became a muscle memory response.

Plenty of people thought text acronyms were dumb and people were even dumber for saying them, even ironically. This is just you being one of those people for the new generation of "kids these days"

[–] gila@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

There is no purpose for using the word 'grape' as a substitute for 'rape' other than to avoid tiktok moderation. It contains the full original word, therefore doesn't serve any censorship purpose. Using it this way can even recontextualise the word in a way that trivialises SA. It's harmful, unlike lol or lmao.

[–] Eylrid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Every generation comes up with new terms that the older generations don't get. The proud tradition has been going strong since language began.

[–] Kayel@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

What is culture?

[–] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wasn't 1984 almost 40 years ago

[–] crashoverride@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a book, I suggest you check out it's themes

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It was also written in 1946 or 47 but published in 1948. See the pattern? They swapped the 4 and 8 and published a dystopian future of the far off year 1984, lol.

Sorry, I just love that little fact.

[–] crashoverride@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Huh, I didn't know that, cool!

[–] archiotterpup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really? One is done for corporate profit. The other is the state.

[–] LetsGoBrandon9982@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

End result is the same for us though. It just ends up being someone different enforcing it.