this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
305 points (94.7% liked)

Games

32681 readers
1092 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Idris Elba, who stars in Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty, sees a future where films and games converge.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] holiday@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Started a fresh playthrough on the 21st and man the time they put in shows. Really wish companies like CDPR would go the Larian route of funding big projects like this instead of going public. Shareholders ruined CP2077 launch. It should have been delayed a year or two from its original launch. Instead it was rushed and then after launch they had to fix the rushed product before making/finishing the game they wanted to make. If CP2077 released as it is now or even slightly less polished, it would be considered a top 5 game of all time.

Lessons are there to be learned by other studios. Hopefully they are paying attention. Gamers will wait for a great game.

All that being said, I'm excited to hand over $30 now that I've seen the game perform. Stoked to see Elba.

[–] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I like how people still try to blame investors to this day

Despite numerous accounts and evidence clearly saying cdpr fucking lied to them too

Dont give them even a single microinch

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just because they were lied to doesn’t mean investors don’t have demands.

[–] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

their demands was based on what they where told by cdpr, and they said to the investors everything was going swimmingly just look it up, you have the information at your fingertips

[–] Defaced@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know what's really funny? CDPR only had one big AAA game release without any major problems, the Witcher 3. Thronebreaker was a small scale game based on something already made and I don't feel that one counts.

The Witcher 1 and the Witcher 2 were bad enough at launch that they had to release an "enhanced edition" of both games to fix the problems. If you don't believe me, then just look at the piss poor Linux "port" of the Witcher 2.

The only reason the Witcher 3 wasn't in such a bad state was because it was delayed like 4 or 5 times and released a year and a half later then it was intended. Cyberpunk 2077 has followed the same development path as the Witcher 1 and 2, but for some stupid reason people thought CDPR was immune to bad releases.

[–] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

WAIT WHAT??? have you been around during launch? does everyone keep forgetting how shit actually was? like i said in a previous comment, it astounds me how people still think they should give these hacks even a microinch. witcher 3 launched in an AWFUL state literally, and i do mean LITERALLY as bad as c2077, it ran like absolute ass, ai was funny as best it took them months to fix the awful state the game run as, the ui also had a serious overhaul, just to name a few youd be lucky to reach a maximum of 60fps on a highend machine of the time. oh and

it was delayed like 4 or 5 times and released a year and a half later then it was intended.

it was delayed once, not 4 to 5 times

this rotating door of a company never had a single release that didnt launch like ass

[–] Defaced@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Were you around during the Witcher 1 and 2 launches? Compared to them them Witcher 3 was a godsend. The Witcher 1 had terrible performance, bad loading times, just bad in general, the Witcher 2 had horrible performance, bad AI pathing, broken quests etc. Both had to have big overhauls.

The Witcher 3 was delayed at least twice, was originally to launch in 2014, then pushed back to February 2015, then again to may 19th 2015, 4 or 5 times is incorrect .The next-gen patches were then delayed a couple times as well. The Witcher 3 was a decent launch outside the garbage nvidia hairworks nonsense.

[–] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sooo like i said, all their games at launch are a dumpsterfire of varying itnensity

[–] Defaced@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, I'm agreeing with you. I don't understand why you're being argumentative about this subject.

[–] Defaced@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Were you around during the Witcher 1 and 2 launches? Compared to them them Witcher 3 was a godsend. The Witcher 1 had terrible performance, bad loading times, just bad in general, the Witcher 2 had horrible performance, bad AI pathing, broken quests etc. Both had to have big overhauls.

The Witcher 3 was delayed at least twice, was originally to launch in 2014, then pushed back to February 2015, then again to may 19th 2015, 4 or 5 times is incorrect .The next-gen patches were then delayed a couple times as well. The Witcher 3 was a decent launch outside the garbage nvidia hairworks nonsense.

[–] brightpants@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 1 year ago

I mean, it would be nice of course, but lets not forget Larian almost went bankrupt in the process. I mean this as in Larian is the exception. And they made a gigantic gamble which could've been their ruin had it not turned out so good.