this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
608 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59593 readers
3158 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

SO. MUCH. THIS.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Robin@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While these sorts of practices are legal, consumers need to be educated.

[–] Guildo@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have another idea - get rid of capitalism.

[–] harpuajim@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Great idea, what are we replacing it with?

[–] danielbln@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater just yet. Capitalism is an incredible engine, but it needs guard rails.

[–] LennethAegis@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The whole infinite growth mentality caused by companies being public on the stock market is the real poison I think. So lets just axe the whole thing. No more stock market, every company is private again.

Which means no more stock speculators, or stock buybacks, or market manipulation schemes. Just companies selling their products to consumers based on their own metrics.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, for starters, this obliterates most people's retirement plans, so that's a bit of a hurdle.

That aside, what would happen is private equity firms and investment banks simply buying up most public companies, so I don't really see the grand improvement here.

[–] msage@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate so much this talking point:

the system has captured the retirements, so we can't abolish it.

Like if we need this load of bull to support retirement, we should rethink everything from the ground up.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point is that, whether you like it or not, abolishing something that most people are very strongly relying on for the last third of their life is something that's going to be incredibly complicated and met with a lot of opposition.

By all means, re-think away as you like, but don't be surprised when a lot of people aren't exactly a fan of what you come up with.

[–] msage@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Provide food and shelter as a human right first, then dismantle everything else, and let people do what they enjoy.

[–] deleted@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To be honest, you cannot achieve capitalism with guard rails.

Rich individuals will accumulate money then bribe or donate to politicians to earn more money thus more bribes then more influence and so on.

Take USA as an example, big corporations have monopoly on almost everything and you as a citizen cannot do anything about it. Sure you can vote but either way, donations to politicians always win.

EU is better but not much. After GDPR, every website would interrupt you to say how they will sell your data and tell you to leave if don’t like it.

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I agree, I don't think any one system is the answer, they all have their strengths and weaknesses... a combination of them would be a better idea.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why am I suddenly seeing so much discussion about capitalism these days? This is way above the usual background level of how often this topic gets brought up in various circumstances.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It's a convenient abstract entity that can be used as a general boogeyman and blamed for all things.

For sure, some things are indeed a direct consequence of capitalism, but lots of other problems come from the simple existence of things having costs, scarcity existing, and humans not being completely selfless. No amount of economic re-arrangement is going to get you away from those things, but it's nice to imagine so.

[–] deleted@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I need security updates not education.