science

14767 readers

95 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

m3t00@lemmy.world

Joleee@lemmy.world

laverabe@lemmy.world

DeadPand@midwest.social

349

Archaeologists discover half a million-year-old wooden structure -- and it's not built by Homo sapiens (www.zmescience.com)

submitted 1 year ago by TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The researchers don’t know which ancient human species made the structure and the tools, but it’s unlikely to have been Homo sapiens. The earliest fossils of Homo sapiens found so far date from around 300,000 years ago and were found in Israel, Dull told CNN. He believes the people who made the structure were cognitively sophisticated and it would be very exciting to figure out who constructed this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why?

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Homo sapians didn't exist a half million years ago.

[–] robdor@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but what about time traveling homo sapiens?

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Those still don't exist now

[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As far as we know. Shouldn't be concerning :)

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, it should be, because that would double the age of the species.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Why should it be concerning as opposed to, say, fascinating?

[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you explain why that would be concerning though? I would celebrate that richness of history.

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Mostly because we’ve been studying H. Sapiens for a long time so being so wrong would suggest a big gap in a dating methodology and the way we’ve tracked human migration of their history.