this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
263 points (96.5% liked)

Privacy

32159 readers
622 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sarmale@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Cant you just make a keyboard app that encrypts it for the recipient while you type it? Will they even ban that?

[–] 520@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are logistical problems with that. Such as how you plan to get the key out to recipients.

[–] sarmale@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When someone wants to start a conversation they send their public key unencrypted (no need for it to be encrypted) and then you send your public key It will be one more message but the keyboard could have some sort of "profiles" for every persons public key, that you could select (This is just an idea, I have no coding experience)

[–] 520@kbin.social -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay, but how do you then make sure that key isn't intercepted? Anyone who has the key can read your messages

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They are talking about asymmetric encryption which has a keypair, private key (kept secret only by the owner) and a public key that is used by everyone that would send them a message. You can’t decrypt the message with the public key when it is encrypted using the public key, you must use the private key to decrypt it.

[–] 520@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, I missed the public key part.

That is true, you could do that

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 2 points 1 year ago

http://pgp.mit.edu/

Yeah, they're a bit cart ahead of horse on that one.

[–] lckdscl@whiskers.bim.boats 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] sarmale@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, like that, thanks for it. was thinking about something that captures the screen and uses OCR to take the encrypted text and then decrypts it. But that would be complicated and would need to be adapted for every app

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

No they won't. The bill is against social media companies, not your own encryption measures. Where the line exactly falls between hand-coding your own cypher; using good old PGP; using an app to encrypt but sending via a separate service; using an e2ee messaging app+service; being on a community/group-focused e2ee service; normal unencrypted-on-server social media... Going by the Reuters article (I haven't read the actual bill) it seems mostly aimed at main social media platforms, with a to-be-explored relationship with private messages.