this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
29 points (91.4% liked)

Science

13200 readers
8 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kayel@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depends on your interpretation of recent.

There was research published along these lines since the 50's and a large surge in the 80s.

It's back in vogue again now and everyone likes their research to be paradigm changing.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hear you.

I was taking a stab at why we never bothered to look for consciousness in babies interactions with the environment before. It does seem an obvious place to look now but considering half of us are still caught on I think there fore I am, I can see why they never bothered to look here.

In Buddhism the ego is sort of a filter of consciousness. Rick Doblin from MAPs said in a podcast I was listening to recently that babies are in the psychedelic state, like egolessness from 5-meo and shit. And that base structure is still there. So it's the base human experience and arises with the environment and then we filter everything through the ego. Including our questions about consciousness itself right? Because it's our lived experience so we're looking through something that's similar.