this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
123 points (99.2% liked)

World News

39011 readers
2794 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Moose@moose.best 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is bait or a joke, right? What a stupid take, you don't have to play devils advocate for everything... Just being alive isn't the biggest carbon footprint you can have, you can massively reduce or increase your contribution based on your voluntary actions. A oil executive probably has a much higher impact on carbon emissions from their choices in business when compared to, say, a monk. "Just go die if you want to save the planet" is not a reasonable solution and these people's deaths are a tragedy that I hope the future looks back in disgust on.

[–] SMITHandWESSON@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Simmer down outrage junkie! It was just a dark joke, and technically, it is correct.🙃

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no, it's not even technically correct. You can technically have a carbon negative footprint on the planet

[–] SMITHandWESSON@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

no, it's not even technically correct. You can technically have a carbon negative footprint on the planet

Lol, really?

I'm pretty sure you're not able to contribute to global warming after death.......Unless you're a fucking necromancer!!!!

So the proper Equation would take what they would have contributed if they were alive, and you add that as savings!!!

PS: If you're a necromancer and you haven't reanimated the dead environmentalist back to life, you're just a fucking dick.🤨

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

yes, as you can actively do stuff to remove carbon from the air. you can't do that when you're dead